Preference Elicitation in Assumption-Based Argumentation
نویسندگان
چکیده
Various structured argumentation frameworks utilize preferences as part of their inference procedure. In this paper, we consider an inverse the standard reasoning problem, seeking to identify what could lead a given set conclusions being drawn. We ground our work in Assumption-Based Argumentation (ABA) framework, and present algorithm which computes enumerates all possible sets (restricted three identified cases) over assumptions system from desired conflict-free can be obtained under semantics. After describing algorithm, establish its soundness, completeness complexity.
منابع مشابه
Assumption-Based Argumentation Dialogues
Formal argumentation based dialogue models have attracted some research interests recently. Within this line of research, we propose a formal model for argumentation-based dialogues between agents, using assumption-based argumentation (ABA). Thus, the dialogues amount to conducting an argumentation process in ABA. The model is given in terms of ABA-specific utterances, debate trees and forests ...
متن کاملAssumption-Based Argumentation
Assumption-Based Argumentation (ABA) [4, 3, 27, 9, 12, 20, 22] was developed, starting in the 90s, as a computational framework to reconcile and generalise most existing approaches to default reasoning [24, 25, 4, 3, 27, 26]. ABA was inspired by Dung’s preferred extension semantics for logic programming [10, 7], with its dialectical interpretation of the acceptability of negation-as-failure ass...
متن کاملAssumption-Based Argumentation Translated to Argumentation Frameworks
This benchmark set consists of 426 instances, i.e., argumentation frameworks (AFs) [3] in apx format, obtained from translating instances from assumptionbased argumentation (ABA) [1] to AFs. The ABA benchmark is detailed in [2] and contains 680 ABA frameworks generated via a random generation model with several parameters. In particular, the ABA benchmark set includes cyclic and acyclic ABA fra...
متن کاملOn the Difference between Assumption-based Argumentation and Abstract Argumentation
In the current paper, we re-examine the connection between abstract argumentation and assumption-based argumentation. These two formalisms are often claimed to be equivalent in the sense that (a) evaluating an assumption based argumentation framework directly with the dedicated semantics, and (b) first constructing the corresponding abstract argumentation framework and then applying the corresp...
متن کاملABA+: Assumption-Based Argumentation with Preferences
My work focuses on using argumentation theory to model common-sense reasoning with preferences. To this end, I have equipped a well-established structured argumentation formalism, Assumption-Based Argumentation, with a preference handling mechanism. I aim to advance the newly proposed formalism, called ABA, present its motivations and place among other argumentation formalisms, and discuss vari...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Lecture Notes in Computer Science
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1611-3349', '0302-9743']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69322-0_13